LawforAll
advocatemmmohan
- advocatemmmohan
- since 1985 practicing as advocate in both civil & criminal laws
WELCOME TO LEGAL WORLD
WELCOME TO MY LEGAL WORLD - SHARE THE KNOWLEDGE
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Building Labour problems – contempt of court =most of the states have not complied with the directions issued by this Court. They had failed to discharge their statutory duties under the provisions of the Building & Other Construction Worker (Regulations of Employment & Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 (for short, `the Act’) and the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 (for short `the Cess Act’), thus, they should be punished for violating the orders of this Court. = audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has not been conducted of the funds placed at the disposal of the concerned authority. We may also notice that large funds are lying with the said Welfare Boards/authorities, but have not been disbursed. The possibility of these amounts being diverted by the state authority for other heads of expenditure in the respective states/union territories cannot be ruled out. Resultantly, while reiterating our earlier orders, we also issue the following directions for their immediate compliance: a) All the State Welfare Boards shall be subjected to audit by the CAG within two months from today. All the States, Union Territories and the State Boards to initiate the process and ensure its completion under the provisions of Section 27 of the Act. [8]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.6
IN
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.318 OF 2006
National Campaign Committee for Central
Legislation on Construction Labour ... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents
WITH
Contempt Petition (C) Nos.41/2011 in WP (C) No.318/2006
Contempt Petition (C) Nos.42/2011 in WP (C) No.318/2006
Contempt Petition (C) Nos.43/2011 in WP (C) No.318/2006
Contempt Petition (C) Nos.44/2011 in WP (C) No.318/2006
O R D E R
This order is in continuation to the all the previous orders
passed by this Court, more particularly, the orders dated 18th
January, 2011, 15th March, 2011, 25th April, 2011 and 28th
November, 2011. Vide Order dated 15th March, 2011, this Court -
[1]
dealt with Contempt Petition Nos.41 - 44 of 2011 filed by the
petitioner and passed certain directions including that the Labour
Secretary of the concerned States should be present in the Court on
the next date of hearing. Thereafter, vide Order dated 25th April,
2011, the States of Nagaland, Rajasthan, Meghalaya, Uttar
Pradesh, Maharashtra, Goa and Uttarakhand, Union Territories of
Lakshadweep and Chandigarh and Union of India were required to
comply with certain directions as well as to file affidavits of
compliance.
The petitioner in Contempt Petition Nos. 41 - 44 of 2011 had
contended that most of the states have not complied with the
directions issued by this Court. They had failed to discharge their
statutory duties under the provisions of the Building & Other
Construction Worker (Regulations of Employment & Conditions of
Service) Act, 1996 (for short, `the Act') and the Building and Other
Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996 (for short `the Cess
Act'), thus, they should be punished for violating the orders of this
Court. However, after passing of the above orders, most of the
states have filed affidavits, showing status of compliance with the
[2]
directions issued by this Court as well as performance of their
statutory duties.
In view of the persistent defaults and unacceptable conduct of
the officers of the concerned states, we passed the following order
on 28th November, 2011:-
"Since almost every State is in contempt, we
have no option but to take further steps in the
matter. However, in order to give opportunity
to the States, the matter is being adjourned to
the last week of December, 2011, to enable
each defaulting State to file it's reply as to
why contempt action should not be taken
against the concerned officers."
Still, a few States have neither filed affidavits nor have they
placed on record any documentation to demonstrate that they have
fully complied with the directions of this Court and have completely
discharged their statutory obligations under the provisions of the
Act. Keeping in view the fact that, despite our order dated 28th
November, 2011, these states have failed to show obedience to the
orders of this Court, the matter was again placed before this Court
on 16th December, 2011, on which date we had reserved the
contempt petitions for orders.
[3]
Category - I -
Under Category-I, we will be dealing with the States of Andhra
Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Punjab and Tamil Nadu. All these states
had filed their respective affidavits in the years 2010 and 2009
respectively. Thereafter, they have not even cared to file further
affidavits as directed by the orders of this Court. Though, all the
above States have constituted Welfare Boards, have registered
workers and establishments in accordance with the provisions of
the Act, notified the prescribed authorities for collection and
disbursement of cess under the Cess Act and have collected some
cess, however, they have not collected the required quantum of cess
and have also not distributed the amount to the registered
applicants in furtherance to implementation of the scheme framed.
The petitioner has also placed on record material to show that these
states are defaulting in this regard. Before we take any action
against the officers responsible for enforcing the schemes and
proper collection and disbursement of cess, we would grant a last
and final opportunity to these states to file affidavits of compliance
within four weeks from today, subject to payment of Rs.10,000/-
[4]
each, as costs. The cost shall be payable to the Supreme Court
Legal Services Committee.
Category - II
Under Category-II, we would pass directions in relation to the
states which have constituted Welfare Boards, notified the statutory
authorities responsible and have even collected the cess, however,
they have not disbursed the cess amounts to the registered
applicants for the reason that the competent authority in the State
Government has not approved the welfare schemes or the welfare
fund has not been constituted. Another reason for such non-
disbursal of cess amount is that no applicants have approached the
Welfare Board/notified authority, for payment under the provisions
of the Act and the Cess Act.
The States of Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Goa,
Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, Maharashtra, Mizoram,
Nagaland, Punjab, Sikkim and Tamil Nadu and Union Territories of
Andaman and Nicobar, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu
and Lakshadweep fall under this category.
[5]
Having perused the affidavits of these states/union territories
and the records before us, we issue the following directions:-
a) The governments of the above-referred states/union
territories are hereby directed to ensure that the welfare
fund is created and welfare schemes are formulated and
notified in accordance with the provisions of the Act and
the Cess Act within four weeks from today.
b) The welfare schemes framed by the respective
states/union territories shall be given due publicity and
be brought to the notice of the concerned workmen and
eligible applicants by the District Authority/Sub-
Committee responsible. We may clarify that there are
certain schemes where the workmen are entitled to
disbursement of the amounts across-the-board, like
education schemes, etc. Every effort should be made to
implement these schemes without any further delay.
c) Affidavit shall be filed by the Secretary (Labour) of the
respective states/union territories within six weeks from
today reporting to this Court the complete compliance
[6]
with these directions. The affidavit shall also give the
up-to-date status -
d) of collection of cess, disbursement of amounts and
implementation of schemes.
Category-III
The States of Kerala, Punjab, Nagaland and Himachal Pradesh
and the Union Territory of Lakshadweep are the states/union
territory which have not given any details of the schemes framed,
reasons for its non-implementation and consequent non-
disbursement of the cess amounts. It is a statutory obligation
upon these states/union territory and the authorities in-charge of
the concerned departments that they ensure implementation of the
schemes and disbursement of the cess amounts. Let now the
schemes be publicized and cess amounts be disbursed to the
eligible applicants in accordance with the provisions of the Act and
the Cess Act within a period of six weeks from today and affidavit of
compliance of the Secretary (Labour) of the states/union territory
be filed within two weeks thereafter.
General Directions
[7]
It is clear from the affidavits filed on behalf of most of the
states and union territories that they are not holding meetings of
the Welfare Board as required, i.e., at least once in two months, to
discharge their statutory functions. Further, it is also apparent
that audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has not
been conducted of the funds placed at the disposal of the concerned
authority. We may also notice that large funds are lying with the
said Welfare Boards/authorities, but have not been disbursed. The
possibility of these amounts being diverted by the state authority
for other heads of expenditure in the respective states/union
territories cannot be ruled out.
Resultantly, while reiterating our earlier orders, we also issue
the following directions for their immediate compliance:
a) All the State Welfare Boards shall be subjected to audit
by the CAG within two months from today. All the States,
Union Territories and the State Boards to initiate the
process and ensure its completion under the provisions
of Section 27 of the Act.
[8]
b) Every Welfare Board shall, without fail, hold its meetings
at least once in two months and submit its Minutes, as
well as the action taken and progress reports in regard to
the framing and implementation of the schemes and
disbursement of funds to the eligible applicants, to the
Secretary (Labour) of that Government quarterly.
c) The funds available with the Welfare Boards which have
not been disbursed or are not likely to be disbursed
within a short period should be properly invested with
the nationalized banks only. Funds available with the
Welfare Boards shall not be utilized by the State for any
other head of expenditure of the State Government, etc.
d) Union of India has filed an affidavit. It is stated in the
affidavit that they have taken various steps, including
steps for amendment of the Act and the Rules framed
thereunder. Union of India is directed to expedite this
process. We also direct the Union of India to discharge
its various statutory functions under the Act with
[9]
particular reference to Sections 24 to 27. It shall also
issue appropriate directions under Section 60 of the Act
to all the State Governments to fully implement the
provisions of the Act as well as the Cess Act.
The above directions should be complied with by all concerned
without fail and within the time afore-stipulated. We make it clear
that in the event of any default committed by any
officer/official/authority, we will be compelled to take action against
the officer/official/authority concerned under the provisions of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 without any further notice.
With these directions, we dispose of these four contempt
petitions & I.A.6, but make it clear that in the event of default, the
petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh contempt petitions before
this Court, in view of the above order.
Let a copy of this order be sent to each Chief Secretary and
Secretary (Labour) of the respective states or union territories.
.................................CJI.
(S.H. Kapadia)
[10]
...................................J.
(A.K. Patnaik)
...................................J.
(Swatanter Kumar)
New Delhi;
February 7, 2012
[11]