LawforAll

advocatemmmohan

My photo
since 1985 practicing as advocate in both civil & criminal laws. This blog is only for information but not for legal opinions

Just for legal information but not form as legal opinion

WELCOME TO MY LEGAL WORLD - SHARE THE KNOWLEDGE

Saturday, October 24, 2026

Uttarakhand High Court Ambrish Kumar Agarwal vs Thakur Dass on 8 September, 2015

 

1. Mandatory Requirement of Filing Plaint in Duplicate under Order IV Rule 1 CPC

  • Core Issue: Whether a suit is deemed duly instituted if the plaint is not accompanied by a duplicate copy as mandated by Order IV Rule 1 CPC.

  • Holding: Yes. Every suit must be instituted by presenting a plaint in duplicate. If it fails to comply with sub-rules (1) and (2) of Rule 1 of Order IV CPC, the plaint shall not be deemed to be duly instituted.

  • Key Paragraphs: Paragraphs 5, 6, and 8.

  • Ratio:

    "Language of Rule 1 of Order IV CPC would demonstrate that every suit shall be instituted by presenting a plaint, in duplicate... If plaint does not comply with the sub-Rules (1) and (2) of Rule 1 of Order IV, then plaint shall not be deemed to be duly instituted." (Paragraph 6)

2. Consequences of Failing to Carry Out Court-Ordered Amendments within Time (Order VI Rule 18 CPC)

  • Core Issue: What are the legal consequences if a party fails to carry out a permitted amendment within the time specified by the court or within the statutory period of 14 days?

  • Holding: If an amendment is not carried out within the specified or extended time under Order VI Rule 18 CPC, the party shall not be permitted to amend thereafter unless the court extends the time.

  • Key Paragraphs: Paragraphs 5, 7, and 8.

  • Ratio:

    "If amendment is not carried out within time or within extended time, as the case may be, amendment shall not be permitted to be carried out thereafter, unless time is further extended." (Paragraph 7)

3. Applicability of Order VII Rule 11(e) CPC to Omissions in Duplicate Copies Post-Amendment

  • Core Issue: Does a failure to mirror a permitted amendment in the duplicate copy of the plaint automatically attract the rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(e) CPC?

  • Holding: No. While the initial plaint must be filed in duplicate, a failure to update the duplicate copy after a court-ordered amendment is a curable defect rather than a fatal flaw mandating the outright rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(e) CPC. The trial court should grant reasonable time to cure such defects.

  • Key Paragraphs: Paragraphs 8 and 9.

  • Ratio:

    "If amendment is not carried out in the duplicate copy of the plaint, it will not be fatal to the plaint. This defect is curable and it can be cured within such time, as fixed by the court by exercising powers under Rule 18 of Order VI CPC." (Paragraph 8)