LawforAll
advocatemmmohan
- advocatemmmohan
- since 1985 practicing as advocate in both civil & criminal laws. This blog is only for information but not for legal opinions
Just for legal information but not form as legal opinion
WELCOME TO MY LEGAL WORLD - SHARE THE KNOWLEDGE
Friday, October 8, 2010
CHEQUE FOR OTHERS DEBT
WHEN THE COMPLAINANT FAILED TO ESTABLISH THAT THE CHEQUE WAS ISSUED FOR THE DISCHARGE OF ANOTHER DEBT, THE CHEQUE BOUNS CASE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE-2010[1] A.L.D. CIRMINAL[BOM.NOC19]13. AND FURTHER MORE THERE IS NO HURDLE EITHER IN EXPLANATION OR IN SECTION THAT THE DEBT MUST BE OF A PERSON WHO ISSUED A CHEQUE . PROVIDED THE COMPLAINANT MUST SHOW AND CLEARLY PLEAD FOR WHICH LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE DEBT , THE CHEQUE WAS ISSUED 2010[1] ALD CIMINAL [KER.NOC1] 1
NO SECOND TIME PRESENTATION OF CHEQUE
AFTER ISSUING A DEMAND NOTICE OF DISHONOR OF CHEQUE AND WITHOUT FILING COMPLAINT WITHIN TIME AND AGAIN PRESENTING CHEQUE FOR SECOND TIME AND AFTER DISHONOR AGAIN ISSUING A DEMAND NOTICE AND FILING COMPLAINT IS A BAD AND AGAINST THE LAW AND AS SUCH NOT MAINTAINABLE - 2010[1]A.L.D. CRIMINAL AP 256.
BANKER - COOPERATIVE SOCIETY
A CO-OPERATE SOCIETY THOUGH IS NOT A BANKER OF REGULAR NATURE DOING BANKING BUSINESS FOR PROFITS, STILL, THE CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETY COMES UNDER THE DEFINITION OF BANKER UNDER SEC. 3 OF TH E ACT. SO WHEN A CHEQUE IS PRESENTED TO CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY AND WHEN IT IS BOUNCED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT OF FUNDS, THE ACCUSED IS LIABLE TO BE PROSECUTED-2010[1] A.L.D. CRIMINAL [KARN.NOC 3]13
|
CHEQUE BOUNS - material alteration
sec. 87 CHEQUE was a self drawn CHEQUE, the complainant strike out the words " self" and insert his name in that column . unless it is proved that the alternation was done with the consent of accused, cheque is not valid and cc is not maintainable as it is materially altered under sec. 87 of Negotiable instrument act - 2010[1] A.L.D. CRIMINAL ( BOM.NOC19)-13
Thursday, October 7, 2010
LAND ACQUISITION - POSSESSION PRIOR TO SEC. 4[1]
WHEN POSSESSION WAS TAKEN PRIOR TO SEC. 4 [1] NOTIFICATION, NO INTEREST IS TO BE GRANTED UNDER SEC.34 FROM THE DATE OF POSSESSION . THE CLAIMANT IS ENTITLED FOR DAMAGES OR RENTS. ALREADY AWARDED AMOUNT UNDER AWARD CAN NOT BE DISTURBED AS PER SEC.25. PARTY IS ENTITLED FOR 9% INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF NOTIFICATION AND THEREAFTER 15% TILL THE DATE OF PAYMENT. AND THE PARTIES ARE LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE LAO FOR FIXING RENT OR DAMAGES.2010 [5] ALT 546.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)