LAY OUT OF PLOTS - AGRICULTURE LANDS

AP AGRICULTURAL LAND [CONVERSION FOR NON-AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES]ACT 2006 - AP URBAN AREAS [DEVELOPMENT]ACT 1975 - GRANT OF LAYOUT S BY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE ACT OF 1975 OR LOCAL AUTHORITIES UNDER MUNICIPALITY, GRAMA PANCHAYAT, INSISTENCE ON SUBMISSION OF CLEARANCE /PERMISSION UNDER THE 2006 ACT . AS IT DEALS WITH ALL LANDS IRRESPECTIVE OF PLACES OR AREAS, PERMISSION IS NECESSARY FOR LAY OUT. PRIOR TO IT , IT IS NOT NECESSARY.

EVICTION FROM LEASED WAKF PROPERTY - CIVIL SUIT

SEC, 6[5], 7, 85 and 83 of WAKF Act - civil court jurisdiction is barred in respect some disputes incorporated in sec. 6 and 7 of the WAKF Act. even though tribunals are constituted for decided disputes , it can not bar the civil court for entertaining other problems not raised in the WAKF Act. giving lease and eviction etc., are not governed by WAKF act, so civil court has got jurisdiction 2010[5] ALT 36 SC.

SEC. 9 AND OR. 7 , RULE 10 - RETURN OF PLAINT

plaint should not be returned several times for filing suitable documents or relevant documents or original certificates or original documents for numbering. at the stage of scrutiny and registration of suit it is no part of duty of court to insist on production of sufficient documentary evidence in support of his prayer of the suit- plaintiff will loses suit, if he failed to prove his case,. it is his headache - 2010 [5] ALT 411.

rules of A.P.HIGH COURT -ADULATORY

AS PER rule 6 [1] [i] , an adulterer is to be made a party to the divorce proceedings and there must be specific, clear INCIDENTS pleading in the petition , then only the divorce petition is maintainable on the ground of adultery , else the petition is liable to dismissed.-2010[5] ALT 507

irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a ground

in the absence of other grounds mentioned in sec. 13 of Hindu marriage act, on sole ground that there is no possibility for reunion between the spouses and it is better to grant divorce as it is irretrievable breakdown of marriage, is not maintainable as there is no such a ground in the act and as such the divorce petition is liable to dismissed -2010[5] ALT 507