fact, especially when there is no quarrel between the
Crl. R.P. No.131/2011
6
aggrieved person and her mother/RW2, and in the
absence of the father, aggrieved person/the daughter,
naturally expected to have entrusted the gold
ornaments with RW2/mother. The same fact is further
reiterated by Ext.D6 and D7 series. However, there is
no clear evidence regarding the entrustment of the gold
ornaments with the 1st respondent/1st revision
petitioner. Going by the judgment of the trial court, it
can be seen that in paragraph 11, the learned
Magistrate has observed that "In this circumstances,
what can be inferred is that the gold ornaments came to
the possession of RW2 from the custody of the first
respondent". On the basis of the above observation, the
learned Magistrate further found in paragraph 12 that
"It is already found that the gold ornaments came to the
possession of RW2, mother from the custody of the first
respondent. So the first respondent had not seriously
challenged the quantity of gold ornaments entrusted
with him". Going by the evidence, which read over by
Crl. R.P. No.131/2011
7
the counsel for the contesting parties and the available
materials would show that, the gold ornaments were
finally pledged by RW2, the mother of the contesting
parties. Except the mere suggestion of PW1, there is no
evidence to show that the gold ornaments were
entrusted with RW1. As per the fourth direction,
learned Magistrate directed the first respondent to
return 32 sovereigns of gold ornaments to the
aggrieved person. The value of 32 sovereigns of gold
ornaments is very high and therefore according to me,
in the absence of proper, reliable and acceptable
evidence that, 32 sovereigns of gold ornaments were
entrusted with the first respondent, the learned
Magistrate ought not have issued such direction. The
said direction is liable to be set aside
LawforAll
advocatemmmohan
- advocatemmmohan
- since 1985 practicing as advocate in both civil & criminal laws
WELCOME TO LEGAL WORLD
WELCOME TO MY LEGAL WORLD - SHARE THE KNOWLEDGE
Friday, September 9, 2011
sister filed domestic violence case – As a matter of fact, especially when there is no quarrel between the « advocatemmmohan
As a matter of