LawforAll

advocatemmmohan

My photo
since 1985 practicing as advocate in both civil & criminal laws

WELCOME TO LEGAL WORLD

WELCOME TO MY LEGAL WORLD - SHARE THE KNOWLEDGE

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

when they filed regular appeal before the High Court challenging the conviction under Section 302 IPC and sentence of life imprisonment, the High Court without going into all the materials including oral and documentary evidence disposed of their appeal affirming the judgment of the Trial Court.=The procedure followed by the High Court in a matter of this nature is not acceptable. Elaborate procedures have been prescribed under Section 386 of Crl.P.C. for disposal of the appeal by the Appellate Court. It is the duty of an Appellate Court to look into the evidence adduced in the case arrive at an independent conclusion as to whether the said evidence can be relied upon or not and even it can be relied upon then whether the prosecution can be said to have proved beyond reasonable doubt on the said evidence. The credibility of a witness has to be adjudged by Appellate Court in drawing inference from proved and admitted facts. the appellants are in jail for a period of more than 11 years and seek for an order of bail from this Court.Since we are now remitting the matters to the …3/- -3- High Court, the appellants are free to make such claim before the High Court. With the above observation, the appeals are disposed of.


CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1584 OF 2012
(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CRL.)NO. 3583 OF 2012)
IQBAL ABDUL SAMIYA MALEK ….APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF GUJARAT ….RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1585 OF 2012
(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 6260 OF 2012)
HENNO @ ANWARALI AMIR MALEQ & ORS. …APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF GUJARAT …RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
Heard both sides.
Leave granted.
It is the grievance of the appellants/accused that when
they filed regular appeal before the High Court challenging the
conviction under Section 302 IPC and sentence of life imprisonment, the
High Court without going into all the materials including oral and
documentary evidence disposed of their appeal affirming the judgment of
the Trial Court.
In view of the above contention, we have gone through the
impugned judgment of the High Court. As rightly pointed out by the
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, after narrating
the case of the prosecution and
…2/-

-2-
the defence as well as the order of the Sessions Judge convicting the
appellants, without adverting to all the materials, the High Court has
merely disposed of the appeal. The procedure followed by the High
Court in a matter of this nature is not acceptable. Elaborate
procedures have been prescribed under Section 386 of Crl.P.C. for
disposal of the appeal by the Appellate Court.
It is the duty of an Appellate Court to look into the
evidence adduced in the case arrive at an independent conclusion as to
whether the said evidence can be relied upon or not and even it can be
relied upon then whether the prosecution can be said to have proved
beyond reasonable doubt on the said evidence. The credibility of a
witness has to be adjudged by Appellate Court in drawing inference from
proved and admitted facts. Further appeal cannot be disposed of without
examining records/merits (Vide Padam Singh Vs. State of U.P., AIR 2000
SC 361 and Bani Singh & Others Vs. State of U.P. 1996 (4) SCC, 720.
The said recourse has not been followed by the High Court.
In view of the same, without expressing anything on the
merits of the claim of either party, we set aside the impugned judgment
of the High Court and remit it to the High Court. We request the High
Court to restore the appeal on its file and dispose of the same as
early as possible preferably within a period of six months.
Learned counsel for the appellants has brought to our
attention to the fact that the appellants are in jail for a period of
more than 11 years and seek for an order of bail from this Court.Since
we are now remitting the matters to the
…3/-
-3-
High Court, the appellants are free to make such claim before the High
Court.
With the above observation, the appeals are disposed of.

………………J.
[P. SATHASIVAM]
NEW DELHI ………………J.
1ST OCTOBER, 2012 [RANJAN GOGOI]