LawforAll

Showing posts with label whether the plaintiff had properly valued the suit and the court fee paid.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label whether the plaintiff had properly valued the suit and the court fee paid.. Show all posts
Thursday, November 22, 2012

whether the plaintiff had properly valued the suit and the court fee paid.whether a suit filed seeking a declaration that a will and a sale deed are void, resulting their cancellation, will fall under Section 7(iv-A) of the Court Fees Act, 1870, as amended by the U.P. Amendment Act (Act XIX of 1938) [for short ‘the U.P. Amendment Act’] or Article 17(iii) of Schedule II of the Court Fees Act, 1870 for the purpose of valuation. Plaintiff, in the instant case, valued the suit at Rs.30 Lakhs for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction. However, for the purpose of court fee, the plaintiff paid a fixed court fee of Rs.200/- under Article 17(iii) of Schedule II of the Court Fees Act. Plaintiff had not noticed the fact that the above mentioned article stood amended by the State, by adding the words “not otherwise provided by this Act”. Since Section 7(iv-A) of the U.P. Amended Act specifically provides for payment of court fee in case where the suit is for or involving cancellation or adjudging/declaring void or voidable an instrument securing property having money value, Article 17(iii) of Schedule II of the Court Fees Act shall not be applicable. 12. For the reasons abovementioned, the appeal lacks in merits and the same is dismissed, with no order as to costs.

                                                                  REPORTABLE                         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     ...