LAW FOR ALL

the authenticity of the purchases from a sister concern of the insured were doubtful. The list of stolen goods/articles was not furnished to the police at the first instance and the bills, which had been submitted, were procured after the occurrence of the theft. 5. In view of the above, we do not find any illegality, irregularity or any jurisdictional error in the order passed by the State Commission and the revision petition is, accordingly, dismissed.