LAW FOR ALL

Sec.5 of Limitation Act - Or.22, rule 3 and Sec.151 CPC - after 7 years of death , and after dismissal of second appeal , these petitions have come with out furnishing sufficient reasons - High court dismissed all and Apex court held that Her plea that she was told by her husband that counsel would inform about the hearing of the application, cannot be a ground to entertain the application for condonation of delay of more than seven years for preferring the petition for substitution. and her plea that she is only person to be substituted due to family settlement not tenable as earlier it was not brought before the court when substitute petition was filed by proforma defendantsand which was later withdraw as not pressed = KARAM KAUR … APPELLANT VERSUS JALANDHAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST & ORS. … RESPONDENTS =2014 ( April.Part) http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41486