LAW FOR ALL

whether the chain is complete or not would depend on the facts of each case emanating from the evidence and no universal yardstick should ever be attempted. That in judging the culpability of the accused, the circumstances adduced when collectively considered, must lead only to the irresistible conclusion that the accused alone is the perpetrator of the crime alleged.- They are thus entitled to the benefit of doubt.=2016 Dec.http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgst.aspx?filename=44289 - NATHIYA Vs. STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE,VELLORE DIPAK MISRA, AMITAVA ROY