LawforAll

Showing posts with label VARINDER KUMAR ....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S). Show all posts
Showing posts with label VARINDER KUMAR ....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S). Show all posts
Thursday, February 14, 2019

The only issue surviving for consideration is with regard to the prosecution being vitiated because PW­10 was the informant as also the Investigating Officer, in view of Mohan Lal (supra). Societal interest therefore mandates that the law laid down in Mohan Lal (supra) cannot be allowed to become a spring board by an accused for being catapulted to acquittal, irrespective of all other considerations pursuant to an investigation and prosecution when the law in that regard was nebulous. Prospective declaration of law is a device innovated by this Court to avoid reopening of settled issues and to prevent multiplicity of proceedings. It is also a device adopted to avoid uncertainty and avoidable litigation. By the very object of prospective declaration of law, it is deemed that all actions taken contrary to the declaration of law, prior to the date of the declaration are validated. This is done in larger public interest. Therefore, the subordinate forums which are bound to apply law declared by this Court are also duty­bound to apply such dictum to cases which would arise in future. Since it is indisputable that a court can overrule a decision there is no valid reason why it should not be restricted to the future and not to the past. Prospective overruling is not only a part of constitutional policy but also an extended facet of stare decisis and not judicial legislation.The criminal justice delivery system, cannot be allowed to veer exclusively to the benefit of the offender making it uni­directional exercise. A proper administration of the criminal justice delivery system, therefore requires balancing the rights of the accused and the prosecution, so that the law laid down in Mohan Lal (supra) is not allowed to become a spring board for acquittal in prosecutions prior to the same, irrespective of all other considerations. We therefore hold that all pending criminal prosecutions, trials and appeals prior to the law laid down in Mohan Lal (supra) shall continue to be governed by the individual facts of the case.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha   REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION     CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos...