LAW FOR ALL

Technical bid & price bid - two Bids - Six were selected - the respondent No.2 quoted less bid, he was awarded with contract works - contract for the supply of 486 Standard Gauge Cars Electrical Multiple Units meant for use in Phase-III of the Mass Rapid Transit System (‘MRTS’ for short) for Delhi and its extension corridors.- Writ - D.B. Declined to interfere as there is no fraud, illegality etc., in allotment of contract - Apex court dismissed the appeal and further held that in the absence of fraud, illegality etc., no court should interfere with the judgement of experts which accepted the bid and allotted contract simply because some of the experts differ with the opinion of experts = M/s Siemens Aktiengeselischaft & S. Ltd. …Appellant Versus DMRC Ltd. & Ors. …Respondents = 2014 ( Feb. Part) judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41226