LAW FOR ALL

Selling of flats - No privity of contract - no deficiency of service- contract between Res. No. 2 and Complainant - Complainant paid amount to Res. 2 - there is no direct contract between Res.1 and complainant - in absence of privity of contract - in the absence of consideration - Res.1 is not liable to refund the amount as the memorandum of agreement was terminated between Res. 2 and Res.1 and as per the termination , the Res.2 has to refund the amount taken from complainants - Res. No.2 not filed any appeal , Res. 1 directed to recover the same from Res. 2 - all revisions are allowed = M/s. Shree Construction Versus 1. Mr. Suryakanth Parshuram Sawant 2. M/s. Vastu Promoters & Consultants … Respondents/Complainants= published in ncdrcrep/judgement/00131202135111612RP2259-258408.htm