LAW FOR ALL

REJECTION OF NOMINATION PAPERS - FOR NON FILING OF ELECTORAL ROLL AS HE BELONGS TO ANOTHER CONSTITUENCY - HIGH COURT SET ASIDE THE ELECTION OF RETURNED CANDIDATE AND REINSTATED THE PETITIONER ON THE GROUND NO ONE FILED - APEX COURT HELD THAT HIGH COURT DID WRONG . AS PER SEC.33 (5) ANOTHER CONSTITUTION PERSON IF CONTESTED HAS TO FILE ELECTORAL ROLL OF LATEST - HELD THAT accordingly, we set aside the judgment of the High Court, treat the election of the appellant as valid and further direct that the appellant shall get the entire remuneration for the period for which he was elected as a member of the legislative Council and we say so on the basis of the Constitution Bench decision in Kirpal Singh, M.L.A. v. Uttam Singh and another[5].= Balram Singh Yadav@ Balram Yadav … Appellant Versus Abhay Kumar Singh …Respondent = 2014 (May. Part) http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41545