LAW FOR ALL

Industrial Disputes Act - Workmen - terminated the service - no retrenchment compensation paid nor notice was issued nor paid wages as per sec.6N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act - Labour court awarded to reappoint the worker with back wages and consequential benefits - High court set aside the order of labour court and awarded to pay damages of one lakh to the worker - Apex court held that Therefore, we deem it fit to construe that the appellant has rendered continuous service for six continuous years (save the artificially imposed break) as provided under Section 25B of the I.D. Act and can therefore be subjected to retrenchment only through the procedure mentioned in the I.D. Act or the state Act in pari materia.=BHUVNESH KUMAR DWIVEDI ………APPELLANT VS. M/S HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD. ……RESPONDENT =2014 ( April.Part) http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41493