LAW FOR ALL

advocatemmmohan@gmail.com .

LawforAll

▼
Showing posts with label EPFO AND ANR. Vs. THE MANAGEMENT OF RSL TEXTILES INDIA PVT. LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EPFO AND ANR. Vs. THE MANAGEMENT OF RSL TEXTILES INDIA PVT. LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR.. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 10, 2017

in Mcleod Russel India Limited Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Jalpaiguri and Others, reported in (2014) 15 SCC 263, wherein it has been held in paragraph 11 that ".....the presence or absence of mens rea and/or actus reus would be a determinative factor in imposing damages under Section 14-B, as also the quantum thereof since it is not inflexible that 100 per cent of the arrears have to be imposed in all the cases. Alternatively stated, if damages have been imposed under Section 14-B, it will be only logical that mens rea and/or actus reus was prevailing at the relevant time."

›
                                                              NON-REPORTABLE                         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA      ...
›
Home
View web version

advocatemmmohan

My photo
advocatemmmohan
since 1985 practicing as advocate in both civil & criminal laws. This blog is only for information but not for legal opinions
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.