LawforAll

▼
Showing posts with label DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT. Show all posts
Monday, February 13, 2012

whether the petition under the provisions of the PWD Act, 2005, was maintainable by a woman, who was no longer residing with her husband or who was allegedly subjected to any act of domestic violence prior to the coming into force of the PWD Act on 26th October, 2006. =even if a wife, who had shared a household in the past, but was no longer doing so when the Act came into force, would still be entitled to the protection of the PWD Act, 2005.

›
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITIO...
Saturday, June 4, 2011

With regard to the execution of the order relating to monetary reliefs Section 20 (6) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act paves the way to the petitioner to approach the trial Court so as to execute the Order. Section 20(6) contemplates that; "Upon the failure on the part of the respondent to make payment in terms of the order under sub section(1), the Magistrate may direct the employer or a debtor of the respondent, to directly pay to the aggrieved person or to deposit with the Court a portion of the wages or salaries or debt due to or accrued to the credit of the respondent, which amount may be adjusted towards the monetary relief payable by the respondent." Section 20(5) envisages that; "The respondent shall pay the monetary relief granted to the aggrieved person within the period specified in the order under sub-section(1)."

›
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.12.2010 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T. MATHIVANAN Crl.O.P Nos.2366...

The admitted facts are that the petitioner and respondent were married as per the Islamic law and the petitioner as a husband has subsequently pronounced talak against the respondent and the respondent has come forward with the suit that the said pronounciation of talak was not in accordance with law and so she sought for declaration that the said 'talak' is null and void and the marriage is subsisting and also for consequential reliefs. The said suit has to enter trial, since the written statement has already been filed on the side of the petitioner. In the meantime the application has been filed by the respondent seeking for an interim maintenance at Rs.40,000/- per month from the date of filing of the suit till the date of disposal under the provisions of Protection of women from Domestic Violence Act 2005.

›
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED  :07-10-2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH CRP.NPD.No.3284 of...
Monday, November 29, 2010

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BY SONS , AGAINST THE MOTHER - BEAUTIFUL JUDGEMENT

›
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU                 Criminal Revision Case No.1093 of  2010 06-07-2010  Sikakollu Chan...
Wednesday, October 20, 2010

RETURN OF GOLD AND OTHER COMPENSATION

›
PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT 2005 - SEC. 12 THE COMPLAINANT FILED PRIVATE COMPLAINT AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR RETURN OF HER ...
Wednesday, October 13, 2010

PROTECTION OF WOMEN UNDER D V ACT

›
SEC.12, 20 AND 22 MONETARY RELIEFS ASKED ONLY AGAINST HUSBAND ONLY, AND NO RELIEFS WERE ASKED AGAINST OTHER RESPONDENTS, AND AS SUCH THE CO...