LawforAll

Showing posts with label Asikali Akbarali Gilani etc. ….Appellants Vs. Nasirhusain Mahebubbhai Chauhan & Ors. ….Respondents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Asikali Akbarali Gilani etc. ….Appellants Vs. Nasirhusain Mahebubbhai Chauhan & Ors. ….Respondents. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 12, 2016

illegal encroachment and structure erected by the appellant on a Municipal Land = We have no hesitation in accepting the argument of the State Authorities that no right can enure in favour of the allottees/occupants of the structure on a public property, in respect of which no formal lease deed has been executed and that too when no prior approval of the State Government for such allotment and grant of lease has been obtained by the Municipality. Understood thus, the direction issued by the High Court in paragraphs 14 and 15 of the impugned judgment, does not merit any interference.= However, if a new policy is required to be formulated, it may provide for rehabilitation of the unauthorized occupants to alternative location, if the unauthorized structure in occupation of a given person has been tolerated for quite some time or has been erected before the cut off date to be specified in that regard. If the structure has been erected after the cut off date, no right of rehabilitation would enure to the occupant(s) of the unauthorized structure(s) on the public property; and such structure(s), in any case will have to be removed in terms of the direction given by the High Court. The State Government may formulate an appropriate policy within six months from today, if already not in existence = The State Government will be free to consider the request of the occupants of unauthorized structures on the subject public property including to ratify the resolution passed in their favour by the Executive Committee of the respondent-Municipality, provided it is in conformity with the expounded policy. If that request is accepted, the Government will be free to provide for such terms and conditions, as may be permissible in law. The Collector may examine the claim of the occupants of the concerned unauthorized structure(s) standing on the subject public property on case to case basis and take suitable action as may be permissible in law If the occupation of the subject public property is not in conformity with the policy of the State Government and the structure cannot be tolerated thereunder, the Collector must then proceed to take action against such structure(s) within two months in accordance with law, for complying the directions given by the High Court.

                                                              NON-REPORTABLE                         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA     ...