LawforAll

▼
Showing posts with label Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 5, 2025

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 37 — Appeal against arbitral award under National Highways Act, 1956 — Scope of interference — Patent illegality — Public policy. Where the Arbitrator enhanced market value of acquired land from ₹98.84 per sq.m. to ₹148.26 per sq.m., and the Principal District Judge, Chittoor dismissed the challenge under Section 34, Held, appellate court’s interference under Section 37 is limited. No patent illegality or perversity found — Appeal dismissed. National Highways Act, 1956 — Section 3G(7) — Determination of compensation — Guidelines — Application. The Arbitrator may consider surrounding factors such as comparative valuation of horticultural components (mango and coconut trees) when no proximate sales in same village are available. Reference to higher fruit-tree valuations in neighbouring States not illegal if used only for comparative guidance.

›
APHC010362252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO ...
Saturday, December 14, 2013

Arbitration and conciliation Act - Disputes between the partieswhether to send it for expert opinion or to arbitrator - High Court instead of deciding issue whether there is any arbitration clause or not-open the issue on merits of disputes - billing - date of billing - billing disputes etc., and appointed arbitrator - Apex court set aside the orders of high court to that extent of opening of issues on merits as it should be decided by the Arbitrator but not by the court = Arasmeta Captive Power Company Private Limited and another ... Appellants Versus Lafarge India Private Limited ...Respondent = published in / cited in / Reported in judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41075

›
  Arbitration and conciliation Act - Disputes between the parties whether to send it for expert opinion or to arbitrator- High Court instea...