LAW FOR ALL
advocatemmmohan@gmail.com .
LawforAll
(Move to ...)
Home
▼
Showing posts with label
ARJUN AND ANR. ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
ARJUN AND ANR. ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
.
Show all posts
Wednesday, February 15, 2017
whether the conviction of the appellants under Section 302 IPC is sustainable. = the evidence of a person does not become effaced from the record merely because he has turned hostile and his deposition must be examined more cautiously to find out as to what extent he has supported the case of the prosecution.= had weapons in their hands, but the sequence of events that have been narrated by the witnesses only show that the weapons were used during altercation in a sudden fight and there was no pre-meditation. Injuries as reflected in the post-mortem report also suggest that appellants have not taken “undue advantage” or acted in a cruel manner. Therefore, in the fact situation, exception (4) under Section 300 IPC is attracted. The incident took place in a sudden fight as such the appellants are entitled to the benefit under Section 300 exception (4) IPC.= In the result, conviction of the appellants under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC is modified as conviction under Section 304 Part I IPC and the sentence is reduced to the period already undergone and these appeals are partly allowed accordingly.
›
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ...
›
Home
View web version