LAW FOR ALL
advocatemmmohan@gmail.com .
LawforAll
(Move to ...)
Home
▼
Showing posts with label
304-B
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
304-B
.
Show all posts
Thursday, July 18, 2013
offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304-B, 406 and 34 of IPC= whether the trial Court was justified in framing a charge under Section 302 of the IPC against the appellants and whether the High Court was justified in affirming that order of the trial Court and dismissing the writ petition filed by the writ petitioners against the same. where this Court has recognized the principle that in cases where the trial Court upon a consideration of broad probabilities of the case based upon total effect of the evidence and documents produced, is satisfied that any addition or alteration of the charge is necessary, it is free to do so. In any such fresh exercise which the trial Court may undertake, it shall remain uninfluenced by the observations made by the High Court on merits of the case including those touching the probative value of the autopsy surgeon’s opinion. In the result, we allow this appeal, set aside the order passed by the High Court and that passed by the trial Court framing the charge under Section 302 IPC and remit the matter back to the trial Court for a fresh order keeping in view the observations made above. No costs.
›
published in http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=40504 Page 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELL...
›
Home
View web version