LAW FOR ALL

Sections 148, 302 read with Section 149 and Section 307 read with Section 149 of the IPC. and read with sec.34 of I.P.C. - Appreciation of Evidence - simply because , four accused out of 8 were acquitted as they are falsely implicated - does not discredit the evidence on other accused too - It is trite that the maxim ‘falsus in uno falsus in omnibus’ has no application in India. It is merely a rule of caution. It does not have the status of rule of law. - When exaggerations are separable from main evidence and Where the chaff can be separated from the grain, it would be open to the court to convict an accused notwithstanding the fact that evidence has been found to be deficient to prove guilt of other accused persons. - Apex court held nothing to interfere = SHEESH RAM AND ORS. …APPELLANTS Versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN …RESPONDENT = 2014 ( January Part ) judis.nic.in/supreme court/filename=41183