LAW FOR ALL
advocatemmmohan@gmail.com .
LawforAll
(Move to ...)
Home
▼
Showing posts with label
27A and 37
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
27A and 37
.
Show all posts
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
Sec.80 Application of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 not barred - Secs.8 ,19, 24, 27A and 37 , and Rules 63,64 and 65 - all rules etc., are in support of central act and in addition to central act - in Rajesh kumar Gupta case it was wrongly decided that the prohibition contained in Rule 63[11] of the 1985 Rules is applicable only to those narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances which are mentioned in Schedule-I to the Rules and not to the psychotropic substances enumerated in the Schedule to the Act. and further held that In the light of our above conclusion the correctness of the orders impugned in all the Criminal Appeals is normally required to be considered by the Bench of appropriate strength. However, in view of the fact that most of these matters are old matters [pertaining to years 2006 to 2013], we deem it appropriate to remit all these matters to the concerned High Courts for passing of appropriate orders in the light of this judgment.=CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 660 OF 2007 Union of India & Another …Appellants Versus Sanjeev V. Deshpande …Respondent = 2014 - Aug.Part - http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41821
›
Sec.80 Application of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 not barred - Secs.8 ,19, 24, 27A and 37 , and Rules 63,64 and 65 - all rule...
›
Home
View web version