LAW FOR ALL

Sec.200 , 204, 208 and 210 and sec.319 of Cr.P.C. - Private complaint against 5 accused under Sections 302, 201 and 120B read with Section 34 of the IPC - Police killed her son - meanwhile human rights directed to register a case against accused police on complaint of human rights activists - FIR registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code (“the IPC”) and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act . - Magistrate took cognizance against 3 accused and refused to take cognizance as the Human right commission not order for registration of FIR against those - and further directed to Tag the complaint with the FIR under sec. 210 of Cr.P.C.- High court in revision - set aside the order of Magistrate and directed the Magistrate to commit the case to sessions court under sec.208 of Cr.P.C. with observation if necessary the sessions court can take cognizance against them under sec.319 of Cr.P.C. - but the Magistrate issued arrest warrant wrongly against all, against it the aggrieved persons filed appeal before the sessions court - Sessions court rightly interpreted the orders of High court - but in revision, the High court set aside the orders of the Sessions court and passed disparage remarks against him - Apex court set aside the orders of High court and set aside the disparage remarks also stating that no court should pass adverse remarks against Lower authorities = Sujoy Kumar Chanda ... Appellant Vs. Damayanti Majhi & Anr. … Respondents = 2014(Feb.Part) judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41250