LawforAll

▼
Sunday, May 31, 2020

In the case of recovery of an article from an accused person when he stands accused of committing offences other than theft also, (in this instance murder), what are the tests: i. The first thing to be established is that the theft and murder forms part of one transaction. The circumstances may indicate that the theft and murder must have been committed at the same time. But it is not safe to draw the inference that the person in possession of the stolen property was the murderer [See Sanwant Khan (supra)]; ii. The nature of the stolen article; 36 iii. The manner of its acquisition by the owner; iv. The nature of evidence about its identification; v. The manner in which it was dealt with by the accused; vi. The place and the circumstances of its recovery; vii. The length of the intervening period; viii. Ability or otherwise of the accused to explain its possession

›
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.57 OF 2013 SONU @ SUNIL ... APPELLANT(S)...

“single counselling” for filling up seats in the Post Graduate Medical Courses leading to Degrees and Diplomas and the seats in DNB (Diplomate of National Board) Courses.= hope that the authorities will be able to have common counselling for DNB PG seats along with all Post Graduate seats leading to Degrees and Diplomas as set out in paragraph 19 of the response of the National Board of Examination so also in paragraph 22 of the response of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare for coming years starting with NEETPG 2021 Examination.

›
Writ Petition (Civil) No._____ of 2020 (Diary No.11011 of 2020) Alapati Jyotsna & Others vs. Union of India & Others  1  NON-REP...

the acquittal of Pramod Singh by the Trial Court was for the reason that he was supposed to have used tamancha (a local firearm), but the police had not recovered the empty cartridges or the pellets from the spot. Pertinently, the Post Mortem Report also does not refer to any pellet injuries. Thus, Pramod Singh was given a benefit of doubt.

›
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 982 OF 2011 OMBIR SINGH ..... APPELL...

https://sites.google.com/view/advocatemmmohansrinikacaselaw/home

›
https://sites.google.com/view/advocatemmmohansrinikacaselaw/home
Thursday, May 28, 2020

›
https://advocatemmmohan.com/2020/05/28/advocatemmmohan/