LAW FOR ALL
advocatemmmohan@gmail.com .
LawforAll
(Move to ...)
Home
▼
Friday, October 31, 2014
Service Matter - Direct Recruitment - Backward Class - Creamy Layer - High court taking into consideration of the income of the respondent held that he is not entitled to claim as B.C. - Apex court held that Individual income should not be calculated for upholding whether he comes under Creamy Layer or not, his parents income has to be consider - as such set aside the High court order and allowed the appeal and While allowing the instant appeal, we restore the appointment of the appellant Surinder Singh to the post of Accounts Officer.=CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6957 OF 2009 Surinder Singh ..Appellant versus Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala and Ors. ..Respondents =2014 - Sept. Month - http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgst.aspx?filename=41999
›
Service Matter - Direct Recruitment - Backward Class - Creamy Layer - High court taking into consideration of the income of the respondent ...
Education - Art. 14 & 19 - Right to practice - GDR Society not a person nor a juristic person can not entertain a petition under Art.19 of Indian Constitution - Refusal to grant Affiliation By AICTE with out assigning valid reasons - voilative of Art.14 and as such the Apex court set aside the order of Executive Council and directed to grant affiliation to the petitioner =WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.653 OF 2014 Rungta Engineering College, Bhilai & Another … Petitioners Versus Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University & Another … Respondents = 2014- Sep.Month -http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgst.aspx?filename=41964
›
Education - Art. 14 & 19 - Right to practice - GDR Society not a person nor a juristic person can not entertain a petition under...
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
Priority of Lien = Stock Exchange Lien over the Defaulter account - Rights of Income Tax department for charging the account of Defaulter for his income tax arrears - Apex court held that since the lien possessed by the Stock Exchange makes it a secured creditor and as such the lien whether the lien under Rule 43 is a statutory lien or is a lien arising out of agreement does not make much of a difference as the Stock Exchange, being a secured creditor, would have priority over Government dues. as it is settled law that no Government holds better right than the secured creditor over the pledged property of defaulter = CIVIL APPEAL NO.4354 of 2003 The Stock Exchange, Bombay …….Appellant Versus V.S. Kandalgaonkar & Ors. ..….Respondents = 2014 - Sept.Month - http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgst.aspx?filename=41963
›
Priority of Lien = Stock Exchange Lien over the Defaulter account - Rights of Income Tax department for charging the account of Defaulter f...
‹
›
Home
View web version