LAW FOR ALL
advocatemmmohan@gmail.com .
LawforAll
(Move to ...)
Home
▼
Friday, January 31, 2014
Limitation Act - Article 55 of the Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 29 the State Financial Corporation Act - suit against Contract of Indemnity arose only after execution of main contract of mortgage/hypothication as per sec.29 of State Financial Act and only after determination of balance due - Apex court held that the suit filed after ascertainment of balance due only cause of action starts but not from the date of recalling notice and as such the suit is within limitation - confirmed the orders of High court = Deepak Bhandari …..........Appellant(s) Versus Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited ….........Respondent(s) = 2014 (January part) judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41189
›
Limitation Act - Article 55 of the Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 29 the State Financial Corporation Act - suit against Contr...
Service matter -Employee & Employer relationships - Dismissed in one case - No inquiry be continued in another case due to dismissal due to lack of Employee and Employer relationship - Respondent No.1 was dismissed pursuant to inquiry in the another charge-sheet - and as such present inquiry pertaining to the charge sheet can not be continued - High court accepted the same and terminate the proceedings - Apex court differed the flat reasons given by the High court as the respondent No.1 filed appeal against the dismissal orders and the same is pending - due to consumption of time - Apex court rejected the appeal of Govt . as no purpose would be served and confirmed the High court order = State of Maharashtra …...... Appellant(s) Versus Vijay Kumar Aggarwal & Anr. ….......Respondent(s) = 2014 ( January Part ) judis.nic.in/supreme court/filename=41188
›
Service matter - Employee & Employer relationships - Dismissed in one case - No inquiry be continued in another case due to dismissal d...
‹
›
Home
View web version