LAW FOR ALL
advocatemmmohan@gmail.com .
LawforAll
(Move to ...)
Home
▼
Wednesday, May 20, 2026
SARFAESI Act, 2002 — Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 — Rule 9(2), Second Proviso — Public auction of secured asset — Highest bid equal to reserve price — Confirmation of sale — Consent of borrower and secured creditor — Mandatory requirement.
›
AP High Court Held That SARFAESI Act, 2002 — Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 — Rule 9(2), Second Proviso — Public auction of s...
SARFAESI Act, 2002 — Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 — R.9(2), Second Proviso — Sale of secured asset — Reserve price — Authorised Officer failing to secure bid higher than reserve price — Confirmation of sale exactly at reserve price — Consent of borrower — Mandatory requirement.
›
AP High Court Held that SARFAESI Act, 2002 — Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 — R.9(2), Second Proviso — Sale of secured asset ...
ADVOCATEMMMOHAN: Tender — Government Contracts — Earnest Money Depo...
›
ADVOCATEMMMOHAN: Tender — Government Contracts — Earnest Money Depo... : advocatemmmohan APEX COURT HELD THAT Tender — Government Contracts...
Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Where disputes concerning immovable property substantially involve contested questions of title, ownership and possession, and no prima facie cognizable criminal offence is disclosed upon preliminary enquiry, police authorities may legitimately treat the matter as civil in nature, and the High Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 ordinarily will relegate the parties to appropriate civil remedies rather than compel initiation of criminal proceedings.
›
AP HIGH COURT HELD THAT Constitution of India – Article 226 – Writ of Mandamus – Police inaction complaint – Land dispute involving alleg...
Criminal Law – Bail under UAPA and NDPS Act – Long incarceration – Speedy trial under Article 21 – Scope of Section 43-D(5) UAPA and Section 37 NDPS Act – Binding effect of larger Bench precedents – Whether statutory embargo overrides constitutional liberty – Grant of bail despite serious allegations of narco-terrorism.
›
apex court held that Criminal Law – Bail under UAPA and NDPS Act – Long incarceration – Speedy trial under Article 21 – Scope of Section 4...
‹
›
Home
View web version