LAW FOR ALL

Or.VII, rule 1 C.P.C - sec. 33 A ,83(1) , 86 and sec.123 1)(A) and (4) of R.P. Act - allowed - on the ground due to contest of same name candidate-respondent No.2 at the instigation of Returned candidate by bribe, he lost some votes - he filed a palm plate issued by second respondent - suppressed his conviction in criminal cases in nomination papers - Returned candidate filed I.A. for dismissal - High court allowed the same - Apex court held that high court rightly allowed the petition and dismissed the election as there are no proper pleadings and material particulars an d facts about the corruption etc., and the Palm plate issued by respondent No.2 not helpful to the case and regarding conviction in appeal the sentence was reduced to less one year and as such non-mention of the same as per sec.33 A not applicable .=CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5987-5988 OF 2012 C.P. John …Appellant VERSUS Babu M. Palissery & Ors. …Respondents = 2014 - sept. month - http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41904