LAW FOR ALL

Service matter - Regularization of service of GDMOs Grade -II - whether from the date of their adhoc appointment or from the date of approval of UPSC - High court order to regularize from the date of RECOMENDATIONS of UPSC - Apex court held that in Dr. Anuradha Bodi (supra) may be conveniently noticed at this stage. “12. If the facts of these two cases are analysed in the light of the aforesaid decisions, there can be no doubt whatever that the petitioners fall within the corollary in Conclusion (A).The orders of appointment issued to the petitioners are very specific in their terms. Though the recruitment rules came into force on 6-8-1982, the appointments were not made in accordance therewith. They were ad hoc and made as a stopgap arrangement. The orders themselves indicated that for the purpose of regular appointment the petitioners were bound to pass the UPSC examination in the normal course [pic]in the direct competition. Hence the petitioners will not fall under the main part of Conclusion (A) or Conclusion (B) as contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners If the GDMOs appointed in Phase-II are similarly circumstanced as Dr. Anuradha Bodi and others, we fail to see how their claim to regularization with effect from the date of their initial appointments can be countenanced except perhaps if we take a view contrary to that has been recorded in Dr. Anuradha Bodi (supra).Accordingly, we do not find any merit or substance in the appeals under consideration. They are, therefore, dismissed but without any order as to costs.= CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8414-8415 OF 2014 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 31023-31024 of 2011) VIRESHWAR SINGH & ORS. ... APPELLANT (S) VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. ... RESPONDENT (S) = 2014 Sep. Month - http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41864