LAW FOR ALL

Alibi - Medical evidence - Non examination of senior counsel to prove alibi instead of office colleague is not a ground for discard the evidence - trial court discarded it where as High court accepted the same and acquitted the accused - when the alleged blunt object said to be used by Accused 4,8 high court acquitted as the Doctor deposed that death was caused due to sharp weapon not by blunt objects said to be used by A 4,8 - Apex court held that nothing is there to interfere - regarding conviction and confirmation of sentences of other accused the Apex court held that the trial court and the High Court recorded concurrent findings holding that the appellants accused Dilawar Singh (A-1), Yash Pal (A-3) and Shamsher Singh (A-7) have committed the offences punishable under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and under Section 148 IPC. It has been repeatedly held by this Court that even though powers of this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution are very wide, in criminal appeals this Court does not interfere with the concurrent findings of fact, save in exceptional circumstances.= CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1362 OF 2010 DILAWAR SINGH & ORS. …Appellants Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent = 2014 - Sept. Month - http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41916