LAW FOR ALL

Sec.18,19 of Army Act and Art.309,310 and 311 - Doctrine of Pleasure -Doctrine of finality- whether amenable to judicial review on the ground of camouflage- Apex court held No - Some army officers were dismissed from service - all writ petitions are dismissed - wrong corregedum of issued unnecessarily adding 5% cut of in gratuity fund and the word dismissed was mentioned as termination - later the 5% cut of in gratuity fund was rectified - this raised to file several writ petitions alleging illegality, bias or malafide or based on any other extraneous ground, and camouflage. - Apex court held that review of it's own orders on the doctrine of finality is not maintainable when the petitioners failed to prove any illegality, bias or malafide or based on any other extraneous ground and no court should exercise it's right on mere camouflage =UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MAJOR S.P. SHARMA AND OTHERS … RESPONDENT(S)= 2014 (March. Part )judis.nic.in/supremecourt/filename=41300